Posthumanistic (Im)possibilities: Navigating the (R)evolutions of the Anthropocene (NeMLA)
Philadelphia
Organization: NeMLA
Event: NeMLA
A recent New York Times article, “Are We in the ‘Anthropocene,’ the Human Age? Nope, Scientists Say,” reported on the ongoing debate among scientists about classifying the Anthropocene as an epoch or an event. Regardless of its definitive place on the geologic time scale, the Anthropocene is a significant marker of history, signifying humans’ profound impact on the environment and the course of evolution. This raises critical questions about the nature of evolution in the Anthropocene. How do we define evolution in this age? The Anthropocene is characterized by human achievements and significant challenges, including wars and climate destruction. These crises force us to question: what kind of Anthropocene are we striving to preserve? The notion of saving the Anthropocene also brings to light the disparities within our global society. Are we considering the Anthropocene as a collective experience or ignoring the existing divisions? Furthermore, the rapid advancements in technology, particularly artificial intelligence, bring additional layers of complexity to this discussion. Who holds the power in this new era of technological evolution? Can human progress truly embody posthumanistic ideals, or will there always be an inherent division between the dominant and the marginalized? As we navigate the complexities of the (r)evolutions of the Anthropocene, how can the Humanities guide us in creating a more equitable and inclusive future?
This panel invites abstracts (200-300 words) along with a short bio-note (50 words) to understand human evolution’s true meaning or question whether we need a massive revolution to redefine what humanity means. We aim to find answers to pressing questions about humanity by examining literature, philosophy, socio-political discourse, and interdisciplinary approaches. This session seeks to address the imminent risks and potential solutions associated with human evolution. Some critical topics for discussion, are not limited to:
-AI and its role in the r/evolution of humanity
-Literature and its role in decoding humanity
-The trauma of the ‘other’
-Metamorphic subjects
-Selective security in the name of evolution
-Film, media and other artistic depictions of a more evolved humanity
-Machines and their evolution
-Power disparity between humanity and its evolution
-Migration and place of climate refugees in evolution
-Anthropocene and Evolution: Theoretical Approaches
Please submit your abstracts (200-300 words) and a bio-note (50 words) through the NeMLA portal by 30th September 2024.
Rohini Chakraborty/ Sriyanka Basak