🍪 We use cookies to improve your experience
We use essential cookies for site functionality and analytics cookies to understand how you use our site. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. Learn more in our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Home Trending Locations Submit Resources Newsletter Pro

Try CFPList Pro

Get matched with CFPs built for your research.

Upgrade to CFPList Pro and get:

  • Research Match: get alerted when CFPs match your research interests
  • Bookmarks & smart deadline reminders
  • Saved searches with email alerts
  • Calendar sync for events & deadlines

7-day free trial · then $5/month · cancel anytime

Start Free Trial
Locations
EVENT Mar 06
ABSTRACT Sep 30
DAYS LEFT 72
VIEWED 152 times

"Why Am I Reading This?" Finding Literary Relevance (NeMLA)

Newport, RI
Organization: NeMLA
Event: NeMLA
Categories: Postcolonial, American, Hispanic & Latino, British, Pedagogy, Literary Theory, World Literatures, African-American, Colonial, Revolution & Early National, Transcendentalists, 1865-1914, 20th & 21st Century, Medieval, Early Modern & Renaissance, Long 18th Century, Romantics, Victorian, 20th & 21st Century, African & African Diasporas, Asian & Asian Diasporas, Australian Literature, Canadian Literature, Caribbean & Caribbean Diasporas, Indian Subcontinent, Eastern European, Mediterranean, Middle East, Native American, Scandinavian, Pacific Literature, Miscellaneous
Bookmark Get Pro Sign up for Pro and let matching CFPs come to you — plus bookmarks and deadline reminders!
Event Date: 2027-03-06 to 2027-03-09 Abstract Due: 2026-09-30

If you’ve taught older literature recently, you’ve probably heard students ask the question "Why am I reading this?" They’ve got a point. Why should we read Shakespeare’s plays, or Paradise Lost, or (god-forbid) “The Rape of the Lock”? We might be able to coax students into reading a Jane Austen novel or even Huckleberry Finn because they are still part of our cultural imagination, but it’s less easy to coax students into reading Beowulf or Tom Jones—texts that are less familiar in form and content. As we jettison the canon and the timeless truths of literature, what do we expect reading older texts will give our students that they wouldn’t otherwise understand? How do we explain our reasoning to students about why they should read texts from earlier literary periods? How do we present these earlier periods (or periodization) and their culture and ideas as relevant to our undergraduate students in our English, writing, or humanities programs? Or is relevance the problem? How might we redefine older literature in our classes, or what we (can) do with these texts? I’m particularly interested in position papers that take into consideration practical pedagogical and theoretical concerns: arguments about curricula, course development or assignments that do different things with this literature. Papers are welcome on any kind of literature/texts or periods prior to 1800.

http://cfplist.com/nemla/home/S/22355

comitini@qu.edu

Patricia Comitini